sex education needs in the community

Sex education, as the term clearly suggests, refers to Enlightenment about human sexual behavior. Parents, schools and caregivers provide in some parts of the world to the children, the increase in measures to their youth. If received formal sex education is taught either as a complete course in college or high school level or in biology, health, home economics. Teaching sex education is a pretty controversial topic to debate for decades, and the discussion should be taught formally in schools or not. Sex education in schools should exist without doubt and fear, because it offers many advantages.
The youth is the "age of storm and stress". The young teenager at this stage of life are profound psychological pressure. Mainly the result of psychological pressure of a growing sexual needs and the biological changes and hormonal effects on individuals. During this time most of the observed children are attracted to light. They find it difficult to employ in most cases with the family. You would not want to inform them about the natural changes that come in to speak their mind and body. Under such circumstances, a very convenient way that the teachers who teach in the position, she, her instincts for a good old age have no effect. In schools, trained teachers would help students know how they deal with their sexual impulses. This role can not be replaced by the parents or other facilities. A classroom discussion and teaching them would feel that it's natural, and they would also have the feeling of being understood by someone. Still do not help taking this separately trained psychologists or other educators. In such a situation, they might consider to be different and misunderstood by family and people around them. Therefore, it is obvious that the best way to provide more sex education in school.

It is a psychological phenomenon that children are at an early age under enormous peer pressure. Something they learn in class with their peer group is what makes a better impression on their minds than usual. They are more focused on teaching and teachers are excited to offer to clarify their demand uncertainty. They feel ashamed and uncomfortable questions about their parents, but it always distinguishes itself in the case of the teacher in the classroom. That's because everyone in the class goes through the same stage. A class discussion is healthy source of learning, as it helps in improving the knowledge about the subject.
Many people argue that sex education should only families, the parents must educate their children means to be limited. This vision is totally illogical and complications and questions. The first point is that not all parents are willing to do it or would be able to do it. Secondly, this program has a proper channel through which he should reach the required student. There are many possible problems in families, so that they may not participate to increase the role of a teacher in the education of their children about sex. The question of the abolition of sex education at school is very conservative.
Most importantly, there are many single parents, how they could separate from the education of their children on their challenge? Parents can not properly educate their children about sex, because they qualified sex educators about details, the missing to bring into the schools. That is the attitude of the abolition of sex education in schools is not a favorable idea. In many cases observed where parents and children talk about sexual issues lay with each other, it is probably uncomfortable situation at both ends. This keeps children from learning the answers to the questions they might have in their minds. This can be a big mistake by the task of sex education teachers to parents. The program allows children only half or less educated on the subject, and if they say: "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing", which can eventually lead to serious situations.
Studies have shown that most parents feel uncomfortable because they know that they are not apt to sexual information to their children. They do not understand what information and details should be hidden and which should be published, taking account of their minor children. On the other hand, some parents who feel comfortable talking to their children about sexual matters, but would only work if the children thing.
Most parents around the world can not look to role models, as they have not talked about sexual issues with their parents in their youth. This makes them inefficient for their roles effectively in the education of their children when the assigned teacher is able to do in the schools to be effective.
Sex education is not only a branch of science is limited. This training focuses on a number of important sexual issues are presented with a specially designed courses and programs. Sex education involves the teaching of relationships, sexual abstinence at a certain level and safer-sex education at the level of the children believed to be sexually active. Therefore she is entitled to adequate and strong leadership base.
At a certain age of puberty in children have growth problems in relationships and control their own emotions. Conflicts associated with such things, too many young people to convince them to commit suicide or participating in other immoral activities. A good sex education in schools focuses on young people emotionally and training methods to deal with relationship problems. This argument shows a very great advantage of sex education in schools.
Sex education is an important public health strategy and that can not be denied. AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases can only be controlled if people are aware of precautions and a broad knowledge in this case be. This knowledge will have to sex education, sex education and if it is banned in schools and parents to educate their children, it would not be beneficial for the individual and society could be transferred in general education.
Sex education does not exist in all parts of the world. Asians are often considered conservative compared to Westerners. It is not a part of their education in schools, in no way saying that their teenage pregnancy rate is lower when it is not exposed to sexual matters openly. In fact, this is an opportunity for colleagues to mislead the majority of young people and convince them to cultivate the young age of sexual relations, without any attempt for the security. This has led to serious problems, such as the spread of deadly diseases like AIDS and also increased rates of illegitimate births has led.
Studies have shown that the cause of the branching of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) in the eras of the 80s and 90s in the United States and Great Britain the lack of knowledge and information about sex in school or at home. Home and family has never and will never play a significant role in the transmission of sex education to young people so dependent on the ability of your home is your own self-deception of the expected demand in the future.
Some conservative groups that claim to discuss sexual issues openly devalue religion. No religion in the world remind his followers to spread the information so important to human life. Sexual behavior is natural and happens to biological changes and this can not be called into question because it is part of human life. So folks, the refuge under the religious retreat their arguments are strong religious misconceptions and laws.
Modernity is the age of the Internet and powerful media. Young people are exposed to Hollywood, television and the Internet. These sources offer demonstration of sex, which is very inconsiderate and casual in this situation it is illogical to conclude that young people who leave their sexual decisions. They are young and full of excitement, and therefore can not be a good choice. Sex education in school provides information and knowledge they need to know about sexual relations with the responsibility to understand associated. The teachers at the school helps the students know the difference between a thoughtful and mindless sex. With the drive for sex is not a problem, it is a natural process that young people develop into adults, but the problem shows unprotected sex with people and injured by sexual possibilities.
People, sex education have to say in the schools do more harm than professionals, who often place close to the findings that sex education should be avoided in school because the most effective instrument for the provision of sex education, according to them, TV, movies, magazines and media. Such people do not understand that the trained sex educators to teach in specially designed programs for sex education of children in schools. They are thus able children from their obvious problems and ambiguities to have the best possible way, while magazines, movies, TV and other media, and the provision of sex education are reliable. They are the most penetrating of the youth in promoting sexual promiscuity rather than effective teaching and educating them. This misguided approach harms society and the individuals in the guise of improvement.
People in contradiction with the idea, insisting that sex education makes the students always have sex and see themselves when they meet again at school. The reality is that the sexual urge of every human being is a natural event. When children reach a certain age, or they find that people are educated about sex or not, they have natural instincts and thus a chance that they will certainly want to satisfy their urge. This natural reaction can be combined in any way the result of sex education in schools. In fact, the best time for sex education have a role to play when the sex drive increases and the youth should be to find a source of satisfaction. It provides people with the necessary knowledge so that they are careful. It is only then that she takes the consequences of sex on the birth of a child and sexually transmitted diseases are to be understood. So Sexual education is basically a warning and a warning for those children who are reinforced in the stage of life where they should know everything.
Some people who oppose us by saying the issue that, although sex education exists, it is not yet the rate of teenage pregnancies has fallen. I'd rather not go deeply into the moral question of the subject, but it is important to discuss here and point out the shortcomings of our society. Social values ​​that single, pregnant teenagers, and well, what needs to be changed there. Through the education of children and make them aware that it's just not cool to be pregnant or if some teens, and just because "others do it the" no way to justify their actions, this change can be achieved. Many sex education programs to students about the serious consequences of early sex can lead to teach. This form of sex education in schools is helpful and makes the students responsible and mature enough to understand to distinguish between morality and immorality.
People to oppose the idea, repeated the claim that sex education why so much importance is attached, there are many other issues related to adolescent overdue as drugs, drinking and aggressive bullying. No doubt, there to observe many other things, important enough to be taught in schools for awareness, but the psychological studies that behind most of the early behavioral problems, one important reason is always the active sex drive who enjoy the drives young people in harmful activities such as drug abuse and alcoholism. It is often observed that young teens who indulge in such activities are not aware of the proper sex education. Once she relaxes a true picture of sex and the consequences of their mental state and they are easily able to deal with other social taboos.
The parents believe that sex education is polluting the minds of their children, many foster children from sex education to the schools. In this method, the population is in its most important religious and family values, they forget that the media, their children also largely exposed to lead them astray. Sex education in schools in no way gives them an open invitation to have sex by themselves are aware of the risks, but only educates them about the case in the best way.
Besides teaching students about safe sex, sex education in schools is also useful because there were students, the correct terminology for the reproductive system, sexually transmitted diseases and prevention of birth of the street lingo that will help get often used by laymen. Gender-based sex education and that is why not move the young students, and learned only in connection with her sex. Early in the class also helps the youth to be abstinent or be responsible for a certain time or if they are already active. Therefore, many sexual problems that occur in adulthood are examined, given how effective sex education and apt at the right time.
A good sex education that is holistic, comprehensive and unbiased never misled or deceived the young people. Such a curriculum in all schools across the country should be imposed, it is an answer to many social problems and conflicts. Would all parents leave their children in preschool age to walk alone on the street, not knowing how to be safe? No parent is actually doing in the same way, let your teenage children with their colleagues and friends to socialize, without a proper sex education is not mentioned to the analogy. It's dangerous and risky for their lives. Thus, a good sex education in schools will be encouraged all the important facts from trained teachers who help and support they cover these issues to learn from key value. Sex education should be taken as a positive aspect that promises healthier and better quality of life for the young. Therefore be taught as a subject in schools, knowledge about the subject, something like the human anatomy or biology class considered increase. Sex education should be provided in all schools available to children to increase their improvement, it will cause only to avoid emotional, social and health problems.